Zephyr
The Newsletter of the Allegheny Mountain Section
of the Air and Waste Management Association
   Volume 25/ Issue 10/  December 2007 Our Sponsors | Advertisers | Luncheon | Events | Contact |  Home | 

The Zephyr

The Zephyr covers news and events of the Allegheny Mountain Section of the Air & Waste Management Association plus regional and national environmental news in the fields of air pollution, water, wastewater, solid waste and environmental management. The Zephyr is published monthly 10 times per year, around the first of the month as a service to Section members. Archive versions of previous editions for the last year can be found here. Print versions are mailed to Section members on request.

Contributions, questions, suggestions, or comments on the Zephyr are welcome and should be submitted by email to rmclaren @ city-net.com  Publication deadline is the 17th of the month for distribution around the first of the following month. The editors reserve the right reject or edit contributed articles as they feel appropriate.

In This Issue:
© Copyright 2007 Allegheny Mountain Section A&WMA. All rights reserved.     

 

From the Chair

Randy York, Chair
Allegheny Mountain Section

randall.york @ erm.com


This is my last "From the Chair" column. I am handing over the Chair to Scott Golla at the end of December. The column and the Section are in great hands. I am truly grateful to have been given the opportunity to follow a long line of outstanding Section leadership. The people who have volunteered to serve the members of the Section as its Chair have been dedicated professionals who have continued their service to the Section and the profession in many ways. I want to thank everyone who has worked on the Section projects this past year and who will do so in the future. This year was a testimony to the heart and strength of the Section. Hosting an Annual Conference & Exhibition (ACE) is always a huge challenge. Add the extra Centennial activities associated with Pittsburgh and the Association and you have maxed out the challenge. The most amazing thing was the pouring out of support of the ACE activities by everyone in the Section, and the tremendous success that was achieved.

One of my key goals for 2007 was to continue the strong performance of the section as the conference played out and we knew our resources would be strained. The best way to meet the challenge was to engage the section membership and tap into the incredible wealth of knowledge, experience, and dedication that is available here. I believe we met that goal with a slate of very strong programs, continued excellence with the Zephyr, support of the ACE by our Education Committee as well as the financial support of the ACE by the Section, good attendance at our luncheons and the roll out of our very first Young Professionals Committee. Special thanks to the Section Committee Chairs who stepped up to the plate to make all of this happen, and to the officers and directors who kept the business running through this incredibly hectic year.

My sincere best wishes to Scott and the rest of the section leaders as we kick off 2008, in the Second Hundred Years of the A&WMA.

Thank you for the opportunity to serve.


Return to the top of the page


Section News

News about and of interest to

members of the

Allegheny Mountain Section

Editor-in-Chief: Arijit Pakrasi, 412/858-3921, e-mail:Arijit.Pakrasi @ shawgrp.com

___________________________________


Annual Election of Officers

The annual election of officers will be held during December. Each Member will receive a mailing describing the election process that will include a PIN for access to the election website, as well as instructions for requesting a paper ballot. The following Members have agreed to place their name in nomination as Section Officers and Board members:

Vice Chair: 1. Arijit Pakrasi; 2. Elizabeth McMeekin
Secretary: 1. Meghan Blaney
Treasurer: 1. Ed Moretti
Director: 1. Dave Testa; 2. Mike Palazzolo; 3. Mike Winek; 4. Melissa D' Andrea; 5. Dave Beachler

Prior to December 17, any International Member may vote online at:
http://www.awma.org/members/elections

If you are unable to vote online and need a paper ballot contact Scott Golla at:
gollasw@westinghouse.com
or call 412/374-5279


Meet the Neighbors:


Over 20 local environmental non-profit and professional organizations participated in the Allegheny Mountain Section Outreach Booth at the A&WMA Convention last June. Two of these organizations were:

Citizens for Pennsylvania's Future (PennFuture), is a statewide nonprofit advocacy group that protects Pennsylvania's environment and economy by combating pollution, encouraging sustainable development and the use of renewable energy. They work to enforce environmental laws and advocate for the transformation of public policy by advancing effective solutions to environmental problems; citizen mobilization; public communications; and providing legal services and policy analysis. Their website is http://www.pennfuture.org/

Pennsylvania Environmental Council, works to protect and restore the natural and built environments through innovation, collaboration, education and advocacy in partnerships with the private sector, government, communities and individuals to improve the quality of life for all Pennsylvanians. Recently, it has been supporting continued funding for programs such as Growing Greener and advocating for improved state water resource management and for improvements to abandoned mine reclamation work. Their website is http://www.pecpa.org/



Feature Articles

News about and of interest to

members of the

Allegheny Mountain Section


_____________________

Chemicals of Interest List Finalized for Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards

On November 20, 2007, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) published in the Federal Register (72 FR 65396) Appendix A of the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS), a critical element of its chemical security efforts.
The appendix contains a list of chemicals that, if possessed by a facility in a specified quantity, trigger a requirement to complete and submit an easy-to-use, online consequence assessment tool called a Top-Screen. The DHS will be better able to make a preliminary determination as to whether a facility presents a high level of security risk and whether it will be required to comply with the substantive requirements of CFATS.
To determine the type and quantity of chemicals that will be subject to the preliminary screening process, DHS examined the following three security issues:

  1. Release—Quantities of toxic, flammable, or explosive chemicals that have the potential to create significant adverse consequences for human life or health if intentionally released or detonated.
  2. Theft and Diversion—Chemicals that have the potential, if stolen or diverted, to be used or converted into weapons.
  3. Sabotage and Contamination—Chemicals that, if mixed with other readily available materials, have the potential to create significant adverse consequences for human life or health.

Appendix A lists approximately 300 chemicals of interest and includes common industrial chemicals such as chlorine, propane, and anhydrous ammonia, as well as specialty chemicals such as arsine and phosphorus trichloride. Facilities that possess chemicals of interest at or above the listed screening threshold quantities are required to complete the Top-Screen within 60 calendar days of the publication of Appendix A –BY JANUARY 21, 2008.
DHS has worked closely with the chemical industry as well as state and local authorities on strengthening security at chemical facilities throughout the country. While many chemical facilities have already initiated voluntary security programs and made significant investments to improve security, gaps remain. The CFATS regulation imposes for the first time comprehensive federal security regulations for high-risk chemical facilities. The CFATS regulation, issued on April 9, 2007, is already being implemented at certain high-risk chemical facilities across the nation.
For more information on chemical security or to view the Appendix A final rule of CFATS, see the Frequently Asked Questions below, or visit www.dhs.gov/chemicalsecurity. See commentary in the Washington Post.

CFATS Frequently Asked Questions
What is Appendix A?
Appendix A of the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS) regulation lists the DHS chemicals of interest and their corresponding Screening Threshold Quantities (STQ). If a facility possesses, or later comes into possession, of a chemical of interest at or above the specified screening threshold quantity, that facility must complete an easy-to-use online consequence assessment tool, known as a Top-Screen.
It is important to note that many facilities that will fill out the Top-Screen may not be subject to further regulation under CFATS by DHS. Appendix A and the Top-Screen will allow DHS to make preliminary determinations about whether facilities present a high level of security risk.
What is the Top-Screen?
The Top-Screen is an easy-to-use online questionnaire that facility owners and operators complete to provide DHS with a basic understanding of the facility’s potential level of consequence. After answering a series of simple questions, DHS will be able to preliminarily determine whether the facility presents a high level of security risk. Not all facilities that complete the Top-Screen will be subject to further regulation by DHS. The Top-Screen is part of the Chemical Security Assessment Tool (CSAT). To register to use the CSAT Top-Screen, facilities should visit www.dhs.gov/chemicalsecurity.
Who Will Be Required to Complete the Top-Screen and by When?
If a facility possesses a chemical of interest at or above the listed screening threshold quantity, the facility must complete and submit a Top-Screen to DHS within 60 calendar days of the publication of a final Appendix A or within 60 calendar days of coming into possession of the listed chemical of interest at or above the listed screening threshold quantity.
What Kinds of Chemicals Does Appendix A Contain and Why?
To determine the type and quantity of chemicals that require a facility to complete the Top-Screen, DHS examined three security issues:

  • Release: Quantities of toxic, flammable, or explosive chemicals that have the potential to create significant adverse consequences for human life or health if intentionally released or detonated.
  • Theft or Diversion: Chemicals that have the potential, if stolen or diverted, to be used as weapons or easily converted into weapons, in order to create significant adverse consequences for human life or health.
  • Sabotage or Contamination: Chemicals that, if mixed with other readily available materials, have the potential to create significant adverse consequences for human health or life.

In the Proposed Rule, Some Screening Threshold Quantities Were Listed as “Any Amount” but the Final Rule Contains Specified Quantities. Why is This and Are There Any Exceptions?
In the initial draft Appendix A, DHS listed various chemicals with a screening threshold quantity of “any amount,” meaning that a facility possessing any amount of that chemical would have to complete the Top-Screen. In the final rule, the department has replaced the “any amount” STQs that appeared in the proposed list with numerical quantities. The revised quantities are more narrowly tailored to capture high-risk chemical facilities.
In addition to this modification, DHS developed a specialized approach for propane, chlorine, and ammonium nitrate.
  • Propane—The screening threshold quantity for propane is 60,000 lbs. Facilities do not need to count propane in tanks of 10,000 lbs or less.
  • Chlorine—Depending on the hazard it presents, there are two screening threshold quantities for chlorine: 1) a screening threshold quantity of 500 pounds when the chemical presents a theft hazard and 2) a screening threshold quantity of 2,500 pounds when the chemical presents a release hazard.
  • Ammonium Nitrate—DHS identified ammonium nitrate in two forms: 1) the explosive and 2) the more common form used as a fertilizer. DHS set different screening threshold quantities for each form, depending on the hazard presented.

Appendix A Lists Propane as a DHS Chemical of Interest. Which Users of Propane Will Be Affected by This Rule and Why?
DHS has included propane on the list of Appendix A chemicals of interest because propane can produce significant consequences if used in a terrorist attack. And this is not hypothetical: Propane has been successfully employed as a component of terrorist devices.
In the proposed rule, DHS listed the screening threshold quantity for propane at 7,500 lbs. In the final rule, DHS has increased the screening threshold quantity for propane to 60,000 lbs. In addition, facilities do not need to count propane in tanks of less than 10,000 lbs.
By doing this, the department has elected at this time to focus its efforts on large commercial propane establishments. This higher threshold quantity will focus DHS’s security screening effort on industrial and major consumers, regional suppliers, bulk retail, and storage sites; the focus is being shifted away from non-industrial propane customers.
Why Regulate These Sites at All?
The recent events in London and Glasgow—in which the terrorists attempted to attack using propane—illustrate how important it is to appropriately secure facilities that possess potentially dangerous chemicals. For example, while poultry farms may not be a direct target of attack, the chemicals they possess might pose a high risk to the surrounding community. One goal of CFATS is to increase security at facilities that possess dangerous chemicals in such a quantity as to pose a threat to the surrounding community. DHS is committed to mitigating these potential threats.
Besides Propane, What Other Key Chemicals Will Be Regulated?
  • Acetone and urea, both of which had been on the initial draft list of chemicals, have been removed. These chemicals can be used, in combination with others (i.e., acetone with hydrogen peroxide and urea with nitric acid), to create chemical mixtures that could be used as precursors to explosives (e.g., Triacetone Triperoxide includes both acetone and hydrogen peroxide). Given the department’s inclusion of concentrated nitric acid and hydrogen peroxide in the appendix, the department does not believe it is necessary to include acetone and urea. The department is electing to regulate the more critical chemicals (i.e., hydrogen peroxide and nitric acid) of those mixtures.
  • Hydrogen peroxide was on the proposed list and remains on the final list. DHS increased the concentration; it had been “at least 30%” and it is now “at least 35%.” A concentration of 35% is a common technical and food grade of hydrogen peroxide.

Will Appendix A Affect College and University Laboratories? If So, Why?
Yes, some college and university laboratories may be affected. Colleges and universities that meet the Appendix A levels—that is, those that possess Appendix A chemicals of interest at or above the listed screening threshold quantities—will have to complete and submit a Top-Screen to DHS. With the information from the Top-Screen, the department will be able to make a determination as to whether the college or university laboratory might present a high level of security risk and therefore must comply with the substantive requirements of CFATS. Facilities determined by DHS not to present a high level of security risk will drop out of the regulatory program and go no further. DHS anticipates that many academic institutions will likely be found not to present a high level of security risk. Facilities determined by DHS to present such a concern, however, will have to comply with the substantive requirements of CFATS—for example, preparing a Security Vulnerability Assessment and developing and implementing a Site Security Plan. Because security across academic institutions varies dramatically, the level of measures necessary for each academic institution will likewise vary. While some academic institutions may have security measures in place that will help them meet the applicable risk-based performance standards, some may not, and DHS looks forward to helping those facilities increase their security.

Return to the top of the page
_________________________

25 YEARS AGO:

Leaded Gasoline

The National Center for Health Statistics releases a study indicating that four percent of all U.S. schoolchildren, including about 12 percent of all African-American preschoolers, have high levels of lead in their blood. About 675,000 children are at risk of kidney damage, brain damage, anemia, retardation, and other
ills associated with lead poisoning. It is recognized that children absorb this lead by breathing air laden with lead pollution, primarily from leaded gasoline.

In 1982, a "cost-benefit analysis" prepared by Joel Schwartz of the EPA "did not support an easing of the lead levels, estimating that elimination of the standard would save the refining industry $100 million per year but would cost between $140 million and $1.4 billion per year to treat an additional 200,00 to 500,000 children for the lead poisoning that would be caused by the higher lead levels." Robert Kennedy, Chief of the EPA's State and Local Controls Program Section, said in an internal memorandum "that lead air pollution monitors had repeatedly underestimated the lead content of air because they were located 'at sites which were not designed to measure maximum lead concentrations."

Lead was finally outlawed as an automotive gasoline additive in this country in 1986--more than sixty years after its introduction. Since the virtual disappearance of leaded gas in the United States, the mean blood-lead level of the American population has declined more than 75 percent. A 1985 EPA study estimated that as many as 5,000 Americans died annually from lead-related heart disease prior to the country's lead phaseout.



_________________________

Internet Site Review

Internet Sites of Interest to Environmental Professionals
with Kim Walker

You can contact me at Kimberly.walker @ erm.com

___________________________________

Environmental Innovation on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/toyotaeurope
Want to see what the latest advancements being developed and engineered that feature “green” design? Unsure where to get it? Well, little did you know you can just log right onto YouTube. Yes, YouTube, the online source that has gone from an indie website to one of the top Internet TV channels that streams 100 million videos a day. The site that also catches you up to speed on green technology. At YouTube, Toyota is sponsoring a series of short clips on environmental innovation from a wide range of different sectors. The “Green Design” movies highlight a series of ideas that enable us to live greener through the use of modern technologies. Toyota sponsors Green Design as part of its “aim: zero emissions” philosophy: Sustainability is about more than just the reduction of exhaust emissions. The company is focused on reducing the environmental impact of a car throughout its entire life cycle, from design and manufacturing through to recycling. Learn more at www.aimzeroemissions.eu.
The “Green Design” films cover a range of topics from eco football to a carbon neutral city to a solar tower in Spain. So log on, and catch up on the late innovations occurring in “green” engineering.

Return to the top of the page


A Word on Water

The Latest News on Water, Wastewater
and Related Topics
with Susan Z. Forney,
susan.zummo.forney@shawgrp.com

___________________________________

New Water Quality Trading Program Maps on the Web

Curious about where water quality trading is happening around the country? Check out EPA’s new water quality trading maps—now live on the Web. EPA has created two trading maps: The first map shows trading programs that have traded at least once as well as state-level trading programs. The second map shows trading programs that received EPA funding. Each map is clickable, just click on the state in which you are interested and it will take you to more information on that state’s trading programs. The maps are located on EPA’s Water Quality Trading website at: http://www.epa.gov/waterqualitytrading/tradingmap.html

Preliminary 2008 Effluent Guidelines Program Plan Available

On October 30, 2007, EPA issued a Federal Register notice presenting the Preliminary 2008 Effluent Guidelines Program Plan. The notice first presents EPA’s 2007 review of existing effluent guidelines. Second, it presents EPA’s evaluation of indirect dischargers without effluent guidelines to identify potential new industries that may need standards. Third this notice presents the preliminary 2008 effluent guidelines program.

The Federal Register notice presents the current status of studies—identified in the 2006 Plan—of the Steam Electric Power Generating, Coal Mining, Coalbed Methane, and Health Services industries that EPA will use to decide whether to revise or establish effluent guidelines.

It also presents an update on two preliminary category reviews also identified in the 2006 Plan. Because the Textile Mills category did not rank among the top toxic pollutant dischargers in the 2007 review, EPA will not pursue further action for this industry. However, due to data limitations, EPA will continue its review of the Ore Mining and Dressing category.

Finally, because the Agency needs more information to decide whether further study is warranted, the Agency will start reviews for two industries - Centralized Waste Treatment and Waste Combustors.

If you wish to comment on any portion of this notice, EPA must receive your comments by December 31, 2007.


Project Will Study Contaminants in Allegheny River Fish

The Allegheny River Stewardship Project, a 20-month, $150,000 community-based project to study contaminants in fish caught in the Allegheny River, held its first public meeting on October 31, 2007. The project is being led by Dr. Conrad Dan Volz, assistant professor in the Graduate School of Public Health (GSPH) at the University of Pittsburgh.

At the meeting, attendees were provided with copies of a 2005-to-2007 fish consumption study documenting concentrations of metals and estrogenic substances. The investigation was led by GSPH researchers and supported by members of Clean Water Action and Venture Outdoors, as well as the UPMC Department of Gastroenterology. Results of the study indicated that fish caught at the Highland Park and Braddock dams and Point State Park in Pittsburgh contained pharmaceutical estrogens. The study also determined that fish from Kittanning had three times the mercury levels of fish from Pittsburgh.

The Allegheny River Stewardship Project will rely on volunteers and conservation groups to monitor the level of contaminants in fish in the river. The goal will be to collect 300 to 500 fish samples from the river from May 1 through mid-June. It will take six months to analyze the fish samples for toxic metals contamination and estrogen compounds. Results of the project are expected to be announced in the spring or early summer of 2009, and participants will be asked to come up with plans to address pollution sources.


ELECTRONIC-BASED TOOL IDENTIFIES COST-EFFECTIVE FUNDING FOR WASTEWATER OR DRINKING WATER MANAGEMENT PROJECTS

States, local governments, nonprofit organizations and others can seek financial assistance through federal programs designed to address current and future water pollution control challenges. The EPA Financing Alternatives Comparison Tool (FACT) is a new tool that can be downloaded to help municipalities, utilities, and environmental organizations identify the most cost effective method or financing option to fund a wastewater or drinking water management project. To download FACT, go to http://www.epa.gov/owm/cwfinance/cwsrf/fact.htm
To learn more about EPA's options for Clean Water financing, go to http://www.epa.gov/owm/cwfinance/index.htm

EPA Releases Operator Training Guidelines for State Underground Storage Tank Programs

The EPA has released the final operator training grant guidelines
for states that implement a key provision of the underground storage tank amendments of the Energy Policy Act of 2005. The operator training grant guidelines describe the minimum requirements states must meet in order to comply with the operator training provision contained in the Energy Policy Act.

The guidelines establish three distinct classes of underground storage tank operators, describe how and when states will implement the guidelines, and discuss when operators must be trained. The guidelines include a description of the classes of operators, required training for each class of operator, deadlines when operator training is required, and examples of acceptable state approaches to operator training. In order for states to comply with these requirements, they must develop state-specific operator training requirements by Aug. 8, 2009, and ensure that all three classes of operators are trained according to state-specific requirements by Aug. 8, 2012.

Comment Deadline for Wetland Guidance Extended
EPA, Army Corps Extend Public Comment Period for Joint Rapanos Guidance

EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) are extending the public comment period for the interagency joint guidance on the scope of Clean Water Act geographic jurisdiction following the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Rapanos v. United States. The public comment period has been extended by 45 days and comments on the guidance and experiences with its implementation are now due by Jan. 21, 2008.

EPA and the Corps issued the guidance in June 2007, consistent with the Supreme Court's decision in the consolidated cases Rapanos v. United States and Carabell v. United States regarding the scope of the agencies' jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act. The guidance supports a strong regulatory program that ensures no net loss of wetlands, which is one of three key elements of the Bush Administration wetlands policy. The other two elements include an active management program that will result in the restoration, enhancement and protection of 3 million acres of wetlands by 2009 and a commitment to conserve isolated wetlands such as prairie potholes.

During the early implementation of the guidance, the agencies are inviting public comments on case studies and experiences in applying the guidance. Comments can be submitted to docket EPA-HQ-OW-2007-0282 through http://www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/component/main . The agencies, within nine months after the Rapanos guidance has been issued, intend to either re-issue, revise, or suspend the guidance after carefully considering the public comments received and field experience with implementing the guidance. For more information, visit: http://www.epa.gov/owow/wetlands/guidance/CWAwaters.html .


Free EPA TMDL Webcast Dec 6

EPA's Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program is sponsoring a Webcast on Thurs. Dec. 6, 2007 at 2:00 - 4:00pm Eastern on EPA’s recently released draft document, Options for Expressing Daily Loads in TMDLs (document posted at: http://www.epa.gov/owow/tmdl/draft_daily_loads_tech.pdf).

This Webcast for TMDL practitioners will provide information regarding options for developing appropriate daily load expressions during the TMDL process. In particular, the Webcast will address the calculation of daily loads for TMDLs that use allocation timeframes that are greater than daily (e.g., annual, seasonal). The Webcast is free, but you need to register in advance to participate. For registration information and the flyer on the Webcast, please go to: http://www.epa.gov/owow/tmdl/training.html . If you prefer to gather and attend as part of a group of co-workers, only one registrant per group is required. For more information, please contact Rosaura Vega at (202) 566-1514 or vega.rosaura@epa.gov.


Return to the top of the page


In the Air

News of Air Pollution Control
and Air Related Issues
with Nancy Hirko, Kimberly Coy, and Mark Schooley of Air/Compliance Consultants, Inc

You can contact them at schooley @ air-comp.com

___________________________________

EPA Reports a Sharp Drop in Acid Rain-Forming Emissions

For the first time ever, sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions from the power sector fell below 10 million tons as reported by EPA's Acid Rain Program and Related Programs 2006 Progress Report. 2006 marks the 12th year of what is widely hailed as one of the most successful environmental programs in U.S. history.

In 2006, annual SO2 emissions from acid rain program electric power generation sources fell sharply, with reductions of 830,000 tons from 2005 levels and an overall reduction of 40% from 1990 levels. Nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions were down by more than 3 million tons since 1990 and had decreased to nearly half the level anticipated without the Acid Rain Program. These reductions have led to a significant decrease in acid deposition, resulting in improved water quality in U.S. lakes and streams. Reduced formation of fine particles, improved air quality, and human health-related benefits are all results from the reduction of these emissions.

Since 1995, the market-based cap-and-trade program has significantly reduced acid deposition in the United States by decreasing SO2 and NOx emissions. The program's rigorous emissions monitoring and allowance tracking has resulted in nearly 100% compliance with the program.
The Acid Rain and Related Programs Progress Report includes emissions, allowance market and compliance data, status and trends in acid deposition, air quality and ecological effects, and information on implementation of the Clean Air Interstate Rule, which will further reduce SO2 and NOx emissions by about 70% and 60% respectively from 2003 levels.

Final EPA Staff Paper Recommends Stronger Standards for Airborne Lead

A key document in EPA’s review of national air quality standards for lead recommends the agency strengthen the current lead standards to better protect children. The Final Staff Paper does not change current air quality standards. It does, however, contain EPA staff recommendations for the administrator to consider in upcoming decisions about revising the national air quality standards for lead.

The Clean Air Act requires EPA to periodically review air quality standards to ensure that it provides adequate health and environmental protection and to update those standards if necessary. The staff based the final paper on a review of current science about lead and health, as well as on analyses of risks at current levels of lead in the air. It recommends that EPA lower the lead standards from the current level of 1.5 micrograms per cubic meter (ug/m3) to a range that extends as high as 0.2 ug/m3 and as low as 0.05 ug/m3. The paper also recommends that EPA not consider revoking the lead standard or removing lead from the list of criteria pollutants.

Average lead concentrations in the air have dropped a dramatic 96% since 1980, primarily as a result of the ban on lead in motor vehicle gasoline. Any changes to the lead air quality standard would not affect that ban. In addition to the changes to improve public health protection, the document recommends that the administrator consider revising the existing secondary lead standard to be equal to a revised primary standard.

The assessments, conclusions, and recommendations included are staff judgments and do not represent agency decisions on the lead standards. By the end of November 2007, EPA will issue an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking outlining policy options it is considering and seeking public comment.

EPA is required by a consent decree to issue a proposal regarding the lead standards by May 1, 2008, and to issue a final rule by Sept. 1, 2008. The agency is planning to issue the proposal in March 2008 to provide the public ample time to comment.

DEP Seeks Comments on PM2.5 Designation Recommendations

HARRISBURG (Nov. 16) -- The Department of Environmental Protection is seeking public comment on its proposed recommendations to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for the designation of areas not meeting the revised 24-hour fine particulate (PM2.5) National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS).

EPA established a revised NAAQS for PM2.5 in October 2006. States are given the opportunity to make recommendations for designation of areas that do and do not meet the standard. EPA is expected to make final designations for attainment and nonattainment areas in December 2009. After the designations are finalized, DEP will have three years to develop a plan for the nonattainment areas to meet the revised 24-hour PM2.5 standard.

Written comments on the recommendations should be sent to Tim Leon-Guerrero, Air Resource Management Division, Bureau of Air Quality, P.O. Box 8468, Harrisburg, PA 17105-8468 or by e-mail to tleonguerr@state.pa.us no later than 4 p.m., Dec. 7. Written comments (including e-mail submittals) must include the name, affiliation (if any), mailing address, and telephone number of the person submitting comments.

For more information, contact the Bureau of Air Quality at 717-787-9495 or visit the DEP Web site at http://www.depweb.state.pa.us, Keyword: “Air Quality.”

EPA Reconsiders the Inclusion of Fugitive Emissions For Determination of Major Modifications

On November 13, 2007, EPA published (72 FR 63850) its proposal to revise the provisions of the December 2002 New Source Review (NSR) final rules relating to the treatment of fugitive emissions for purposes of determining whether a physical or operational change at an existing major source qualifies as a major modification.

EPA plans to reverse its existing policy and include fugitive emissions as part of the major modification determination – but only for the source categories that have been already designated through rulemaking in the Clean Air Act, §302(j). These are the 28 source categories as listed in the Clean Air Act §169A(7).

EPA is planning to use the same approach to fugitive emissions currently used for determining whether a source is major, for determining whether a change is a major modification. Also in this proposal, EPA provides guidelines for determining when and how emissions are to be considered fugitive for NSR and Title V permitting. Comments must be received on or before January 14, 2008.

New Tools Make Understanding Air Quality Easier Than Ever

(Washington, D.C. – November 19, 2007) Ever used your computer to "fly" through the mountains, or zoom in on a satellite picture of your house? Now you can use the same technology to learn more about emissions and air quality across the country and where you live.

EPA has developed two tools that let computer users "see" air quality information on a virtual globe. Both tools are available to the public starting today.

The first tool is part of the new "Air Emission Sources" Web site, which is designed to make emissions data for six common pollutants easy to find and understand. Based on the latest National Emissions Inventory, the site uses charts and Google Earth files to answer a user’s questions. Users can look at overall emissions, emissions by type of industry, or emissions by largest polluter.

Want to know what industry emits the most sulfur dioxide in your state? Select your state from a map, pick a pollutant, and the site creates a chart showing you emissions by industry. Want to "see" which refineries in your state emit the most sulfur dioxide? Use the "tilt" feature in Google Earth to quickly find the largest emitter. Then click on the balloon to get more details about emissions from that facility.

EPA also is providing Air Quality Index (AQI) information in the Google Earth format. Use the AQI tool to quickly see air quality across the country, then click on a specific location to see that city’s AQI forecast and current levels of ozone or particle pollution.

The AQI is EPA’s color-coded tool to inform the public about daily air pollution levels in their communities. EPA, in collaboration with state and local governments, provides AQI forecasts and conditions for more than 300 cities across the United States.

On the web:
Go to the Air Emissions Sources Web site: http://www.epa.gov/air/emissions
View information in Google Earth format about which facilities emit any of six common pollutants: http://www.epa.gov/air/emissions/where.htm
See AQI forecasts and current conditions: http://www.airnow.gov
View air quality information in Google Earth format: http://airnow.gov/index.cfm?action=google_earth.main
EPA is also using the Google Earth platform to display Acid Rain Program data: http://epa.gov/airmarkets/progress/interactivemapping.html

Return to the top of the page


International
Focus

News of Environmental Trends and Regulations
in Other Countries

with Kim Walker

You can contact me at Kimberly.walker @ erm.com

___________________________________

Global Agreement on Mercury Pollution Is Focus of International Meeting

Experts are becoming increasingly concerned that increased burning of coal, naturally contaminated with mercury, is leading to releases to the air in some parts of the world from where it can spread around the globe. Therefore, governments and experts are meeting in Bangkok under the auspices of the UNEP's Chemicals Branch to discuss how best to reduce environmental sources of mercury with a range of options on the table from voluntary measures and initiatives up to legally binding treaties.
Mercury is linked with a wide range of health effects including irreversible damage to the human nervous system, including the brain, and scientists have concluded there is no safe limit when it comes to mercury exposure. Every person alive today (about 6.5 billion people) is thought to have at least trace levels of the heavy metal in their tissues. UN Under-Secretary General Steiner stated that scientists have been warning about the dangers to human health, wildlife, and the wider environment for well over a century. "And it is true that many countries have, in recent decades, taken steps to reduce mercury uses and releases and to protect their citizens from exposure to this toxic heavy metal," he added. "However, the fact remains that a comprehensive and decisive response to the global challenge of mercury is not in place and this needs to be urgently addressed.”
UNEP's flagship report the Global Environment Outlook-4 released last month states that that coal burning and waste incineration account for about 70% of the total quantified emissions of mercury. "As combustion of fossil fuels is increasing, mercury emissions can be expected to increase, in the absence of control technologies or prevention," says the GEO-4, the peer-reviewed work of more than 1,000 scientists and experts.
Scientists are also testing suggestions that climate change may be triggering releases of new, as well as the re-activation of old, deposits of mercury as a result of rising lake temperatures, erosion, and the accelerated melting of permafrost, ice sheets, and icebergs at the poles. From here the mercury, in a form known as methymercury, can enter the global food chain via marine mammals such as whales and seals and internationally caught and traded fish such as swordfish, shark, marlin, mackerel, walleye, sea bass, and tuna.
The Bangkok "Open-Ended Working Group" meeting will also be attended by industry and civil society groups. The results of the meeting will be compiled into a report to be presented to an environment ministers meeting in February in Monaco during UNEP's Governing Council/Global Ministerial Environment Forum. UNEP is urging governments, working with industry and civil society, to begin setting "clear and ambitious targets" to get global mercury levels down and to set the stage for mercury-free products and processes world-wide.

(Source: http://www.unep.org/Documents.Multilingual/Default.asp?DocumentID=521&ArticleID=5702&l=en)

Return to the top of the page


Solid Waste Views

with John Scrabis, P.E.

You can contact me at: jmscrabis @ mactec.com

___________________________________

Go Green for the Holidays

Between the stuffing of the turkey and ringing in the New Year, California, like the rest of the nation, generates an enormous amount of waste. But the California Integrated Waste Management Board has some holiday waste management tips that even the Grinch can't steal. Between Thanksgiving and the New Year, it is estimated that an extra million tons of waste are generated nationwide each week. In fact, 38,000 miles of ribbon alone is thrown out each year—enough to tie a bow around the Earth!
"We can all get a little carried away with the season’s festivities," said Board Chair Margo Reid Brown. "In the spirit of giving, the Waste Board is happy to offer some helpful tips (http://www.ciwmb.ca.gov/PublicEd/Holidays/default.htm) that we can all take to heart."

1. Buy gifts made from recycled products.
When it comes to gifts, the Board suggests giving the ones that "Yule" remember. Some of the most unique and interesting gift items can be found online at outlets like RecycleStore(http://www.ciwmb.ca.gov/RecycleStore/default.asp).
According to the Board, some of the most memorable gifts can have the least environmental impact, with a little forethought. Gift certificates, tickets to sporting and entertainment events, and homemade items all have special meanings to those on the receiving end.

Given the number of Christmas gifts sure to run on batteries this season, the Board reminds buyers that rechargeable power sources are easier on the environment and can be thrifty in the long run. Visit CIWMB's rechargeable batteries webpage (http://www.ciwmb.ca.gov/WPW/Power/RechBattInfo.htm) for more information about the seasonal merits of using rechargeable batteries.

2. Be creative when wrapping gifts.
When it comes to wrapping that special holiday season gift, the Board offers waste-not tips that can rival the gifts themselves in thought and ingenuity. Instead of purchasing reams of expensive wrapping paper, why not substitute reusable boxes, brightly colored canvas tote bags, colorful pillow cases or holiday fabric for toys and similar items, dish towels for kitchen ware, oven mitts for utensils, tablecloths for eating and dining presents, or hang earrings, bracelets, and other jewelry on the Christmas tree itself? Check stores for recycled-content holiday cards and envelopes or make them yourself. Gift tags can be made from last year's recycled holiday cards.

3. Make gift opening an environmentally friendly effort.
When it comes to opening those mountains of holiday gifts, there are ways to manage and minimize waste by following some simple recommendations:

  • Set aside large box containers to hold wrapping paper, then select those wrappings with potential for reuse next year. Most gift boxes can be flattened and stored away for extended use again and again.
  • Christmas cards can become next season's colorful gift tags.
  • If you received a new microwave, toaster, clock radio, toy, or coat, then consider giving away your old appliances, toys, games, or clothing to a local charity or thrift store.
  • Drop off extra packaging materials at local private mailing centers, whose phone numbers can usually be found in the Yellow Pages Directory.
  • Finally, don't forget to save all reusable ribbons, bows, and other package decorations for future reuse opportunities.

And remember, donating old TVs, computers, clothes, and other items extends their useful service lives and keeps landfills free of unnecessary waste. If donation isn't a practical option, the board recommends that consumers learn where to safely recycle their obsolete electronic waste products (http://www.erecycle.org/).

4. Recycle Christmas trees.
According to the National Christmas Tree Association, more than 33 million real Christmas trees are sold nationwide every year. If you bought a live Christmas tree, be sure to plant it or donate it to a local school or nursing home to plant on their grounds. If you bought a cut tree, remove all decorations including tinsel and lights before recycling. Check your local paper for instructions on recycling options and the dates for pickup or drop-off. City and county Christmas tree recycling programs are also advertised on the radio.
Many California communities have Christmas tree recycling programs. Contact your local government or ask your local Christmas tree grower about programs in your area. You can also visit the Earth 911 website (http://earth911.org/green-your-holidays/) to find a local Christmas tree recycling program.

Return to the top of the page


ENVIROCABULARY

Environmental Acronyms, Obscure Words
and Other Lingo
with Kim Walker

You can contact me at Kimberly.walker @ erm.com

___________________________________


Each month, the Envirocabulary staff will scour the environmental literature for terms of interest to our readers. This month’s term is…

Entrain: To trap bubbles in water either mechanically through turbulence or chemically through a reaction.

(Source: Environmental Protection Agency Terms of Environment: Glossary, Abbreviations and Acronyms, http://www.epa.gov/OCEPAterms/eterms.html)

Return to the top of the page


P2 Forum

News on Pollution Prevention,
Recycling and Related Issues
with Michael Stepaniak

You can contact me at michaels @ ccicenter.org

___________________________________

This Month:

Reducing Waste During the Holidays

New Energy Star Tool Can Help Keep Homes Warm

Green Homes Web Site Launched

REDUCING WASTE DURING THE HOLIDAYS -Many of us look forward to the holiday season. It’s traditionally a time for family and friends to get together and reconnect. Often overlooked however, are the mountains of seasonal waste that are produced and end up in landfills. According to national sources, more than six million tons of extra refuse is generated nationwide each year between Thanksgiving and New Year. The amount is largely made up of cards, wrapping paper, ribbons and bows, boxes, trees, and an assortment of old throwaways. Here are just ten of the many easy ways each one of us can help reduce the trash glut and make a difference: 1) Get creative with wrapping - reuse old maps, newspapers, magazines, comics, gift bags, or even brown bags tied with reusable raffia, ribbons, or bows. 2) Choose holiday cards and envelopes made from recycled-content paper. Even better, e-mail your greetings. 3) Recycle wrapping paper and cards with your mixed paper. Remember though, that papers with metallic surfaces cannot be recycled. 4) If part of your holiday tradition includes a tree, purchase a live one with bundled roots and plant it after the holidays. If this isn’t feasible, recycle your cut tree so it can be chipped for mulch. 5) If using decorative lights, purchase strands of lights that are parallel wired, meaning that each bulb has separate circuitry. This way, if one bulb burns out or malfunctions, the rest of the strand will continue to glow. 6) Wrap gifts in useful items, such as kitchen utensils in an oven mitt or kitchen towel. Present gifts in reusable storage boxes tied with ribbon. Consider hanging gift jewelry items like bracelets, necklaces, and earrings right on the tree. 7) Recycle foam packaging material, if a local facility is available, and “packing peanuts” at a local drop-off recycling center. 8) Set the dining table with linens and china or compostable items instead of disposable paper plates and plastic cups and utensils. 9) Save ribbons and bows for reuse next year, as most cannot be recycled. 10) Don’t throw away old toys, clothing, or electronics just because they’re being replaced with newer versions. Donate usable items to charitable organizations to ensure they are reused. If we all set aside just a little time to let the creative juices flow, it’s possible to offset some of the additional burden that’s usually placed on regional landfills this time of year. Wishing you peace and health in the coming year.

NEW ENERGY STAR TOOL CAN HELP KEEP HOMES WARM – With temperatures dropping, and record-setting energy costs being predicted, a new online tool from EPA can help consumers reduce energy bills by up to 25%. The resource, named Energy Star Home Advisor , provides consumers with personalized recommendations for improving energy efficiency and comfort. According to EPA the average American family spends approximately $1,900 per year on energy bills. As an example of potential savings, EPA estimates that homeowners can reduce their energy bill by up to 10% by simply sealing air leaks and adding insulation. Using the Energy Star Home Advisor is easy to use. You simply enter your zip code and some basic information about the types of fuel used to heat the home. Based on this information you are provided with recommended home improvement projects to increase energy efficiency and comfort. You can also review the average energy savings provided by implementing these improvements. The most common recommendations include sealing air leaks and ducts; adding insulation; installing a programmable thermostat; replacing older heating, cooling, and water-heating equipment with more efficient units; as well as changing lighting, appliances, and windows to Energy Star qualified models. Visit the Energy Star Home Advisor at http://www.energystar.gov/homeadvisor .

GREEN HOMES WEBSITE LAUNCHED - The U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) recently announced the launch of a new website that will give homeowners, homebuyers, renters, and landlords the tools they need to ensure their homes are as healthful and environmentally friendly as possible. The Green Home Guide details the the ways green homes can benefit people's health and finances, as well as reduce negative impacts on the local community and the world at large. According to the USGBC, green homes use approximately 40 percent less energy and 50 percent less water than conventional homes. Green homes also make use of less toxic materials, such as paints and cleaning products that don't emit harmful chemicals into the air. And, they are built with a focus on carefully selected materials, those that are recycled, locally produced, and created from sustainably grown, renewable resources. The Green Home Guide was developed by USGBC with the support of Newland Communities, a planned community developer. According to Newland Communities, if consumers are educated and have access to all of the information they need, they will be able to make smart, healthful, and sustainable decisions. The website describes how families have gone green by providing profiles of homes that have been certified under the USGBC's Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design® (LEED) for Homes rating system. It also offers details on the LEED for Homes system, including help in finding LEED builders and professionals nearby. It includes checklists not only for new homes but also for renovating an existing home. The USGBC points out that green homes are increasingly becoming a key part of the U.S. homebuilding market. Access the Green Home Guide at http://www.greenhomeguide.org,

Return to the top of the page


Compliance Corner

What's New with Regulatory Compliance,
Environmental Management
and Related Issues
with Dan Hagerty, CHMM

You can contact me at daniel_hagerty @ hotmail.com
______________________________

OSHA Renews Alliance With the National Safety Council
OSHA has renewed its alliance with the National Safety Council (NSC) to continue providing health and safety information to the construction and general industries. The alliance will specifically focus on encouraging motor vehicle safety and drug-free workplaces. It will also address first-aid training in the workplace, including Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and the use of Automated External Defibrillators.
"Increasing the health and well-being of employees in the construction and general industries has been the primary focus of our alliance with NSC," said Assistant Secretary of Labor for OSHA Edwin G. Foulke Jr. "I am pleased this alliance will continue to promote workplace safety, while highlighting the importance of emergency first-aid training, vehicle safety education, and a drug-free work environment."
"The National Safety Council and OSHA have a long-standing relationship based on our organizations' missions to reduce occupational injuries," said Alan C. McMillan, president and CEO, National Safety Council. "Renewing this alliance further facilitates our mutual promotion of safety in the workplace while giving special attention to driving safety and drug-free workplaces, both significant occupational safety issues."
Over the past year, the alliance has reached more than 577,000 individuals on safety and health issues through events and interactive activities, such as the 2006 National Safety Congress and Expo, the 2007 National Safety Month, and OSHA's electronic assistance tools.

DOT Updates Guide for Shipping Hazardous Materials
The DOT is updating it guide on how to use its hazardous materials regulations. Under a new program, the agency is asking for your comments on the guide. You can view or download a copy of the draft guide at http://hazmat.dot.gov/HMpubsreview/docs/howtouse.pdf. Submit your comments on the guide to the DOT by March 11, 2008, at http://hazmat.dot.gov/HMpubsreview/shipping_safely.html.

OSHA/EPA Occupational Chemical Database
OSHA and EPA jointly developed and maintain a new database as a convenient reference for occupational safety and health information. This database compiles information from several government agencies and organizations. Available database reports include: "Physical Properties," "Exposure Guidelines," "NIOSH Pocket Guide," and "Emergency Response Information," including the DOT Emergency Response Guide. In addition, an all-in-one report, "Full Report," is available.

Overall Workplace Injury and Illness Rate Lowest on Record
The rate of workplace injuries and illnesses in private industry declined in 2006 for the fourth consecutive year, according to the Labor Department’s Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). Approximately 4.1 million injuries and illnesses occurred in 2006. The number translates to a rate of 4.4 cases per 100 full-time employees, slightly less than the 4.6 rate reported last year. Secretary of Labor Elaine L. Chao said that “workplace injuries and illnesses declined 3% in 2006 over the previous year against the backdrop that overall hours worked increased (2%). The Department of Labor continues to focus on ensuring that workplace injury and illness rates continue to decline and that workers are healthy and safe on the job.”

Return to the top of the page